Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50761 - 50770 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 50761 - 50770 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
responded by claiming that a “friend had driven him home and was currently upstairs sleeping.” The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57605 - 2010-12-08
responded by claiming that a “friend had driven him home and was currently upstairs sleeping.” The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57605 - 2010-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
, and then quickly fled. At trial, the State presented several witnesses who claimed to have been among the shooters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37749 - 2009-07-15
, and then quickly fled. At trial, the State presented several witnesses who claimed to have been among the shooters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37749 - 2009-07-15
State v. Rita A. Whitish
before she used it. She claimed that the last time she had used that particular car was the previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9087 - 2005-03-31
before she used it. She claimed that the last time she had used that particular car was the previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9087 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to raise other nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849221 - 2024-09-18
to raise other nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849221 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, was never explained to him. ¶3 Schroder’s claims are directly contradicted by the record. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75603 - 2014-09-15
, was never explained to him. ¶3 Schroder’s claims are directly contradicted by the record. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75603 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Radtke claims that the videotaped statement was improperly admitted as a prior consistent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26679 - 2014-09-15
, Radtke claims that the videotaped statement was improperly admitted as a prior consistent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26679 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Larry Farris
claims matter during the period of suspension. Shortly thereafter during a telephone conversation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16837 - 2005-03-31
claims matter during the period of suspension. Shortly thereafter during a telephone conversation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the child.” Kenneth claims that we must reverse the court’s decision as co-parenting is what “joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247965 - 2019-10-09
the child.” Kenneth claims that we must reverse the court’s decision as co-parenting is what “joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247965 - 2019-10-09
[PDF]
State v. Alexis C.
. appeals from an order adjudicating him a delinquent for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2489 - 2017-09-19
. appeals from an order adjudicating him a delinquent for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Sendejo
his motion to modify his sentence. Sendejo claims that the corrected judgment is invalid because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4067 - 2017-09-20
his motion to modify his sentence. Sendejo claims that the corrected judgment is invalid because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4067 - 2017-09-20

