Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 62305 for child support.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 62305 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Donald B.
to support the jury’s finding, and because the verdict was not inconsistent, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2328 - 2017-09-19
to support the jury’s finding, and because the verdict was not inconsistent, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2328 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
paternity and had taken steps to avoid paying child support. Mosher also reiterated that Eddie had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96917 - 2014-09-15
paternity and had taken steps to avoid paying child support. Mosher also reiterated that Eddie had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96917 - 2014-09-15
State v. George Smith
Alford plea, alleging that there was no factual basis to support the charge since child enticement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16964 - 2005-03-31
Alford plea, alleging that there was no factual basis to support the charge since child enticement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Lisa B.’s fourth and youngest child. The three older children were removed from Lisa B.’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
, Lisa B.’s fourth and youngest child. The three older children were removed from Lisa B.’s custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. George Smith
Alford plea, alleging that there was no factual basis to support the charge since child enticement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16964 - 2017-09-21
Alford plea, alleging that there was no factual basis to support the charge since child enticement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence to support the convictions; and (3) his right to a speedy trial was violated. We resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195274 - 2017-09-21
evidence to support the convictions; and (3) his right to a speedy trial was violated. We resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appellate issues. Accordingly, we affirm. Schmidt was charged with repeated sexual assault of a child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12
appellate issues. Accordingly, we affirm. Schmidt was charged with repeated sexual assault of a child
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him of child enticement and incest with a child. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490009 - 2022-03-09
convicting him of child enticement and incest with a child. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490009 - 2022-03-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the State’s expert is sufficient to support this element by showing the impact on the child of the delay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100457 - 2017-09-21
of the State’s expert is sufficient to support this element by showing the impact on the child of the delay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100457 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals from a judgment convicting her of two counts of neglecting a child resulting in great bodily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287685 - 2020-09-16
appeals from a judgment convicting her of two counts of neglecting a child resulting in great bodily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287685 - 2020-09-16