Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Freese
an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15004 - 2017-09-21
an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
granting summary judgment de novo. Lambrecht v. Estate of Kaczmarczyk, 2001 WI 25, ¶21, 241 Wis. 2d 804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29382 - 2014-09-15
granting summary judgment de novo. Lambrecht v. Estate of Kaczmarczyk, 2001 WI 25, ¶21, 241 Wis. 2d 804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brett M. Trenter
to a set of undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Wilke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
to a set of undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Wilke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9782 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo Perez
)(a), STATS., which is an issue which we review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19
)(a), STATS., which is an issue which we review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46658 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46658 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this court directly, but this impermissibly skips the required step of de novo review of the commissioner’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656559 - 2023-05-18
to this court directly, but this impermissibly skips the required step of de novo review of the commissioner’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656559 - 2023-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
credit is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Lange, 2003 WI App 2, ¶41, 259
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101470 - 2017-09-21
credit is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Lange, 2003 WI App 2, ¶41, 259
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101470 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rick A. Knutson
, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. For a police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2009-01-27
, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. For a police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
found in favor of the Board, and Hudnall sought de novo review in the circuit court. Hudnall failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915431 - 2025-02-18
found in favor of the Board, and Hudnall sought de novo review in the circuit court. Hudnall failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915431 - 2025-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02