Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 57201 for id.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 57201 for id.
State v. Rosemarie Parsons
of the case.” Id. at 694. The ultimate determination whether counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3894 - 2005-03-31
of the case.” Id. at 694. The ultimate determination whether counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s error is “fundamental” or “technical.” Id., ¶24. A fundamental error is one that is “basic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232741 - 2019-01-15
the court’s error is “fundamental” or “technical.” Id., ¶24. A fundamental error is one that is “basic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232741 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that they were required to find the value of the property subject to the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
that they were required to find the value of the property subject to the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to this “alternative test” as the “second” test or “additional test.” Id. We use the term “additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28954 - 2014-09-15
to this “alternative test” as the “second” test or “additional test.” Id. We use the term “additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28954 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not raised first in the trial court will generally not be properly preserved for appeal. Id., ¶10. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07
not raised first in the trial court will generally not be properly preserved for appeal. Id., ¶10. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Whether those facts constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Whether those facts constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.’” Id., ¶20 (citation omitted). The strong presumption is that counsel rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35903 - 2009-03-17
in the outcome.’” Id., ¶20 (citation omitted). The strong presumption is that counsel rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35903 - 2009-03-17
State v. John W. Page
of a dangerous weapon. Id. The jury was instructed that if it was “satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31
of a dangerous weapon. Id. The jury was instructed that if it was “satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See id. at 520. The court therefore denied Flowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See id. at 520. The court therefore denied Flowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to contest the allegations in the petition.” Id. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82885 - 2014-09-15
, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to contest the allegations in the petition.” Id. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82885 - 2014-09-15