Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 64953 for or b.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 64953 for or b.
State v. Basil Richmond
by § 972.11(2)(b), Stats., the rape shield law, may be admissible if the evidence is so relevant and probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14113 - 2005-03-31
by § 972.11(2)(b), Stats., the rape shield law, may be admissible if the evidence is so relevant and probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14113 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
documents to prove the debt. He argues that Wis. Stat. §§ 802.01(2)(b) and 802.03(7) require not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34079 - 2008-09-23
documents to prove the debt. He argues that Wis. Stat. §§ 802.01(2)(b) and 802.03(7) require not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34079 - 2008-09-23
Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
of circumstances affecting the best interests of the children. Section 767.325(1)(b)1, Stats. A “substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14627 - 2005-03-31
of circumstances affecting the best interests of the children. Section 767.325(1)(b)1, Stats. A “substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
), contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b).3 He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55771 - 2014-09-15
), contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b).3 He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Appleton v. David D. Stout
alcohol concentration, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). He contends the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26303 - 2017-09-21
alcohol concentration, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). He contends the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26303 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
17-09 rule petition supporting memo
for SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4)(b)2 Relating to Petition 17- _09_____
/supreme/docs/1709memo.pdf - 2017-09-28
for SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 10.03(4)(b)2 Relating to Petition 17- _09_____
/supreme/docs/1709memo.pdf - 2017-09-28
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
v. Nathan J. White1 08-27-2025 Affirmed 2024AP000106 CR State v. B. R. B.1 05-13-2025
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023008 - 2025-10-09
v. Nathan J. White1 08-27-2025 Affirmed 2024AP000106 CR State v. B. R. B.1 05-13-2025
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023008 - 2025-10-09
[PDF]
State v. Howard S. Cleaves
while under the influence of an intoxicant. Section 346.63(3)(b) specifically defines “operate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19
while under the influence of an intoxicant. Section 346.63(3)(b) specifically defines “operate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John E.
, this court finds no error in the exercise of the trial court’s discretion. B. Admission of Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15853 - 2017-09-21
, this court finds no error in the exercise of the trial court’s discretion. B. Admission of Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karen Herek v. State
. No. 01-0031 3 See 42 U.S.C. § 1396k(b) (2001) and § 49.89(5). They contend that the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3470 - 2017-09-20
. No. 01-0031 3 See 42 U.S.C. § 1396k(b) (2001) and § 49.89(5). They contend that the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3470 - 2017-09-20