Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 5081 - 5090 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
County of Calumet v. Dennis P. Ragen
, the prosecution is required to prove by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence that the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12780 - 2017-09-21
, the prosecution is required to prove by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence that the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas D. Severson
burden of proof for the OMVWI, the prosecution was required to establish that (1) Severson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5275 - 2017-09-19
burden of proof for the OMVWI, the prosecution was required to establish that (1) Severson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5275 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stanley E. Young
not contest that the prosecution proved the elements established in Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1). Instead, he seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31
not contest that the prosecution proved the elements established in Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1). Instead, he seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Green Lake v. John D. Pearson
(2)(b), STATS., differently. An OWI forfeiture prosecution is a civil proceeding. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15292 - 2017-09-21
(2)(b), STATS., differently. An OWI forfeiture prosecution is a civil proceeding. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15292 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey White
before sentencing for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3400 - 2005-03-31
before sentencing for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3400 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig L. Miller
STAT. § 939.66(2m) provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3348 - 2017-09-19
STAT. § 939.66(2m) provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3348 - 2017-09-19
William J. McKibbin v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
, and that a breathalyzer registered a .136 blood alcohol content. In a subsequent prosecution on that charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8552 - 2005-03-31
, and that a breathalyzer registered a .136 blood alcohol content. In a subsequent prosecution on that charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8552 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Olson
of proof for the OMVWI, the prosecution was required to establish that (1) Olson was operating a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5619 - 2017-09-19
of proof for the OMVWI, the prosecution was required to establish that (1) Olson was operating a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5619 - 2017-09-19
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
Kennedy noted that certain of the other contacts could have been prosecuted as criminal matters rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11704 - 2005-03-31
Kennedy noted that certain of the other contacts could have been prosecuted as criminal matters rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206810 - 2018-01-08
because the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206810 - 2018-01-08