Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50831 - 50840 of 84001 for simple case search.

State v. Paul Matek
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13059 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP2087-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629875 - 2023-03-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Extruder Corp., 533 F. Supp. 1205 (E.D. Wis. 1982). This case was first cited in Jacobson’s response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134102 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James Paul O'Neil
2003 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-1029-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16618 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
of redemption in this case, the Gillings, as Wisnefske’s assigns, became the equitable owners of the farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Contrary to Koenig’s assertion, the amended version of Wis. Stat. § 907.02 does not apply to his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131990 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724162 - 2023-11-08

COURT OF APPEALS
to be a test case, I think it’s a pretty poor one to take up to the Supreme Court if high school students
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104910 - 2013-11-26

[PDF] State v. Anthony Hicks
, violates his constitutional rights, we reverse the order and remand this case to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8137 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 35
2012 WI APP 35 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP703
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78512 - 2014-09-15