Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50861 - 50870 of 57651 for id.

[PDF] Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
). Our review is de novo. See id. at 115, 334 N.W.2d at 582. Further, this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11101 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James D. Curtis
5 Id. at 397, 485 N.W.2d at 420. Thus, the State argues that the Nowak waiver rule applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael Ray Juber
reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark T. Smith
the requested instruction unless the evidence reasonably requires it. Id. No. 2004AP2711-CR 6 ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21029 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶8 In O’Connor’s case, the suspicion that prompted the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91896 - 2013-01-22

[PDF] Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
.” Id. at 183, 515 N.W.2d at 890. Northpointe argues that § 70.47(7), STATS., governs the procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8586 - 2017-09-19

Annette Petrowsky v. Brad Krause
is ambiguous should the court look to the history, legislative intent, and purpose of the statute. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12815 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
principles to those findings. Id. Investigative traffic stops are subject to the constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257483 - 2020-04-15

COURT OF APPEALS
medical and psychiatric history. See id., ¶15. Trial counsel testified that he was aware of Guman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50285 - 2010-05-24

Cheryl A. Basten v. Dale M. Basten
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. Underlying discretionary determinations may be questions of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2379 - 2005-03-31