Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50881 - 50890 of 69191 for as he.
Search results 50881 - 50890 of 69191 for as he.
CA Blank Order
was convicted of fleeing a traffic officer. Sentence was withheld and he was placed on probation consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119180 - 2014-08-11
was convicted of fleeing a traffic officer. Sentence was withheld and he was placed on probation consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119180 - 2014-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. ch. 54. He filed a habeas corpus petition arguing that, when the Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=457857 - 2021-12-02
WIS. STAT. ch. 54. He filed a habeas corpus petition arguing that, when the Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=457857 - 2021-12-02
[PDF]
State v. Michael Mackessy
, as is required by § 809.19(1)(e). Instead, he provides a narration of what he contends occurred during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4408 - 2017-09-19
, as is required by § 809.19(1)(e). Instead, he provides a narration of what he contends occurred during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4408 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1)(e).[1] Reungsy was advised of his right to respond and he responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138307 - 2015-03-23
, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1)(e).[1] Reungsy was advised of his right to respond and he responded
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138307 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Krueger
cause. Attorney Krueger was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1991 and he became licensed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16839 - 2017-09-21
cause. Attorney Krueger was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1991 and he became licensed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16839 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karen M. Keip v. Duane A. Keip
was “flirting with shirking” but decided not to order him to seek full-time employment because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11778 - 2017-09-20
was “flirting with shirking” but decided not to order him to seek full-time employment because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11778 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
his motion for sentence modification. Specifically, he asserts that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110988 - 2014-04-29
his motion for sentence modification. Specifically, he asserts that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110988 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
him while he was incarcerated. We conclude that the trial court correctly denied the motion, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
him while he was incarcerated. We conclude that the trial court correctly denied the motion, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James L. Allen
decision. At the sentencing hearing he admitted violating his terms of probation. This appeal concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9383 - 2017-09-19
decision. At the sentencing hearing he admitted violating his terms of probation. This appeal concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9383 - 2017-09-19
Kenneth Curran v. James Warren
The conclusion section of Curran’s brief is the clearest section. It is apparent that he wants a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21631 - 2006-03-01
The conclusion section of Curran’s brief is the clearest section. It is apparent that he wants a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21631 - 2006-03-01