Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50881 - 50890 of 59029 for do.
Search results 50881 - 50890 of 59029 for do.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
explains why having the phone records would help him with his defense. The records do not refute that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
explains why having the phone records would help him with his defense. The records do not refute that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
individual she accused of sexual misconduct using initials that do not conform to their actual names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042021 - 2025-11-26
individual she accused of sexual misconduct using initials that do not conform to their actual names
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042021 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record. However, the facts do not appear anywhere in the refusal hearing transcript. We infer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213236 - 2018-05-30
in the record. However, the facts do not appear anywhere in the refusal hearing transcript. We infer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213236 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Stuempfig
will be in a position to know about. In this case, I do find that Officer Miller was within six to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20882 - 2017-09-21
will be in a position to know about. In this case, I do find that Officer Miller was within six to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20882 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Darice G. Griffin v. Ronald W. Griffin
and educational expense obligations imposed by the circuit court were appropriate. We do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6397 - 2017-09-19
and educational expense obligations imposed by the circuit court were appropriate. We do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6397 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164379 - 2017-09-21
the court does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164379 - 2017-09-21
John J.A. Reuter v. Covenant Healthcare System, Inc.
.2d 751 (Ct. App. 1988), in which this court stated that “[g]enerally, we do not consider arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15967 - 2005-03-31
.2d 751 (Ct. App. 1988), in which this court stated that “[g]enerally, we do not consider arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing.” Therefore, we do not further discuss this potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
be a single conviction for purposes of sentencing.” Therefore, we do not further discuss this potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles Young-Cooper
acknowledged going over it with his attorney and understanding what he was doing, no basis exists to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14646 - 2017-09-21
acknowledged going over it with his attorney and understanding what he was doing, no basis exists to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14646 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 The Baudrys contend that we do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
. ¶7 The Baudrys contend that we do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02