Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5091 - 5100 of 83303 for case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to suppress evidence. After reviewing the record and briefs, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175007 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98122 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
then obtained a search warrant to permit a trained dog to smell the area for drugs, leading to the eventual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248447 - 2019-10-15

State v. Bobby Recco Jones
was ineffective by not moving to suppress evidence recovered in a search. To establish ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11592 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bobby Recco Jones
in a search. To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11592 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
suppressed drug evidence because, he claims, police unlawfully searched his shoes during a field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87110 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Fortune received a tip that he had drugs in his possession. Two agents searched Fortune’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21

WI APP 92 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1712-CR Complete Title...
2011 WI APP 92 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1712-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64233 - 2011-06-28

[PDF] State v. Christopher T. Gile
law unconstitutionally penalized him for electing his right to refuse consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5632 - 2017-09-19

State v. Christopher T. Gile
penalized him for electing his right to refuse consent to a search and seizure of his person. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5632 - 2005-03-31