Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50911 - 50920 of 83007 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50911 - 50920 of 83007 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
on a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and the motion is denied, the introduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31258 - 2014-09-15
on a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and the motion is denied, the introduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not that the juror was biased against the defendant under the facts and circumstances of the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61192 - 2014-09-15
not that the juror was biased against the defendant under the facts and circumstances of the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61192 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105214 - 2013-12-10
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105214 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a controlled substance. The remaining counts, as well as the charges in a separate case, were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
of a controlled substance. The remaining counts, as well as the charges in a separate case, were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
Frontsheet
2008 WI 100 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP2629-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33456 - 2008-07-16
2008 WI 100 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP2629-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33456 - 2008-07-16
State v. Daniel Goodremote II
are implicated to some degree, in this case it is not likely that the jury would believe J.D.’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12568 - 2005-03-31
are implicated to some degree, in this case it is not likely that the jury would believe J.D.’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12568 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶37. ¶4 The State argues that prior cases have established that a disparity in sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71359 - 2011-09-26
.” Id., ¶37. ¶4 The State argues that prior cases have established that a disparity in sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71359 - 2011-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“assess[es] the merits of the challenge by considering the facts of the particular case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238506 - 2019-04-04
“assess[es] the merits of the challenge by considering the facts of the particular case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238506 - 2019-04-04
[PDF]
Berton D. Sherman v. Don Hagness
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8010 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8010 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
in the supplemental no-merit report: In this case, Mr. Fulsom cannot show that there is a reasonable probability he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
in the supplemental no-merit report: In this case, Mr. Fulsom cannot show that there is a reasonable probability he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27