Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50911 - 50920 of 83088 for simple case search.
Search results 50911 - 50920 of 83088 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and that the plea will result in a finding of parental unfitness, see id., ¶10. As in a criminal case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551603 - 2022-08-02
, and that the plea will result in a finding of parental unfitness, see id., ¶10. As in a criminal case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551603 - 2022-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
District] Attorney Dietz is there a plea agreement in this case? ATTORNEY DIETZ: There is, your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
District] Attorney Dietz is there a plea agreement in this case? ATTORNEY DIETZ: There is, your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS
a juvenile,” Stefan nevertheless argues that “the analyses in cases relating to juvenile defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
a juvenile,” Stefan nevertheless argues that “the analyses in cases relating to juvenile defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
[PDF]
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to their case. The trial court pointed out that its scheduling order required the disclosure of expert
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
to their case. The trial court pointed out that its scheduling order required the disclosure of expert
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
Redgie Staskal v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
issues which brought this case within the three special circumstances set forth in Nelson v. Davidson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8514 - 2005-03-31
issues which brought this case within the three special circumstances set forth in Nelson v. Davidson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8514 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Lootans
presented. The facts in this case are undisputed. A determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
presented. The facts in this case are undisputed. A determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 474 U.S. at 59. This remains the case even in his reply brief, where Preston asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918191 - 2025-02-26
, 474 U.S. at 59. This remains the case even in his reply brief, where Preston asserts that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918191 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
as a mortgage foreclosure case rather than a land contract foreclosure case….” Gabert appeals. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33166 - 2014-09-15
as a mortgage foreclosure case rather than a land contract foreclosure case….” Gabert appeals. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33166 - 2014-09-15
Delmar F. Renak v. Raymond G. Feest
of a stipulation of facts permitting the circuit court to decide the case on the legal issues. Millen v. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18876 - 2005-07-05
of a stipulation of facts permitting the circuit court to decide the case on the legal issues. Millen v. Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18876 - 2005-07-05