Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50911 - 50920 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 50911 - 50920 of 83395 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
testimony in the case of a co-defendant provided a factual basis for the charges. We therefore conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93169 - 2013-02-18
testimony in the case of a co-defendant provided a factual basis for the charges. We therefore conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93169 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
State v. Billy J. Rachal
the fight. ¶3 The case went to trial on charges of mayhem and witness intimidation. To support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3029 - 2017-09-19
the fight. ¶3 The case went to trial on charges of mayhem and witness intimidation. To support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3029 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
(1990) (citations omitted). Case law has defined “held out for public use” as “whether, on any given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14922 - 2006-10-24
(1990) (citations omitted). Case law has defined “held out for public use” as “whether, on any given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14922 - 2006-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-82, 246 N.W.2d 521 (1976). In this case, the Paulys do not dispute either the Village’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101949 - 2017-09-21
-82, 246 N.W.2d 521 (1976). In this case, the Paulys do not dispute either the Village’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Racine Education Association v. Racine Unified School District
. at 144. ¶8 In this case, the parties do not dispute the underlying facts, but rather contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15574 - 2017-09-21
. at 144. ¶8 In this case, the parties do not dispute the underlying facts, but rather contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15574 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The 2 We placed this case on hold on August 2, 2017. We now lift the hold and decide the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
. The 2 We placed this case on hold on August 2, 2017. We now lift the hold and decide the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
Bies v. State, 76 Wis. 2d 457, 469, 251 N.W.2d 461 (1977). ¶5 The State contends that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31159 - 2014-09-15
Bies v. State, 76 Wis. 2d 457, 469, 251 N.W.2d 461 (1977). ¶5 The State contends that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathan O. Jones
record and other records in the case. See Morones v. State, 61 Wis.2d 544, 552-53, 213 N.W.2d 31, 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
record and other records in the case. See Morones v. State, 61 Wis.2d 544, 552-53, 213 N.W.2d 31, 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936250 - 2025-04-03
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936250 - 2025-04-03