Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50951 - 50960 of 61681 for judgment.
Search results 50951 - 50960 of 61681 for judgment.
State v. Reginald E. Sims
. ¶3 Sims did not appeal from the judgments of conviction, but rather filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
. ¶3 Sims did not appeal from the judgments of conviction, but rather filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
modification on a judgment entered following the revocation of his probation. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6654 - 2017-09-20
modification on a judgment entered following the revocation of his probation. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6654 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or “this court will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id.; see also WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
or “this court will summarily reverse the judgment or order appealed from.” See id.; see also WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237853 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
State v. David T.O.
out in his brief, the State is simply attempting to replace the trial court's judgment with its own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
out in his brief, the State is simply attempting to replace the trial court's judgment with its own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1967), we affirmed the judgments of conviction. 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449421 - 2021-11-09
(1967), we affirmed the judgments of conviction. 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449421 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the 1994 judgment of conviction and the 1995 denial of postconviction relief had long since expired. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187048 - 2017-09-21
the 1994 judgment of conviction and the 1995 denial of postconviction relief had long since expired. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187048 - 2017-09-21
Vances Smith v. Gary R. McCaughtry
will and not its judgment; and whether the decision was reasonable given the evidence. See State ex rel. Richards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14088 - 2005-03-31
will and not its judgment; and whether the decision was reasonable given the evidence. See State ex rel. Richards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14088 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385482 - 2021-07-08
of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385482 - 2021-07-08