Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50971 - 50980 of 57869 for id.
Search results 50971 - 50980 of 57869 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
disregard” for Cunning’s life. See id. Dawson pointed a loaded, semi-automatic gun at his friend. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
disregard” for Cunning’s life. See id. Dawson pointed a loaded, semi-automatic gun at his friend. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105037 - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in imposing the sentence. Id., ¶21. Here, Tuchalski asserts that the court erroneously believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95261 - 2014-09-15
in imposing the sentence. Id., ¶21. Here, Tuchalski asserts that the court erroneously believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95261 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Entis Rees
, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 501. ¶8 In the alternative, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4353 - 2017-09-19
, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 501. ¶8 In the alternative, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4353 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
autoantibodies. See id. Nos. 2020AP1400-CR 2020AP1401-CR 4 impossible for Jones to meet
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434491 - 2021-10-05
autoantibodies. See id. Nos. 2020AP1400-CR 2020AP1401-CR 4 impossible for Jones to meet
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434491 - 2021-10-05
State v. Antroy T. McGee
“well within the limits of the maximum sentence” is not unduly harsh. Id., ¶¶31-32. We review a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
“well within the limits of the maximum sentence” is not unduly harsh. Id., ¶¶31-32. We review a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26534 - 2006-09-20
CA Blank Order
of conviction or may direct the clerk’s office to make such a correction. Id., ¶5.
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134530 - 2015-02-10
of conviction or may direct the clerk’s office to make such a correction. Id., ¶5.
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134530 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the applicable constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We first address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29301 - 2007-06-12
the applicable constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We first address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29301 - 2007-06-12
Carl Jensen v. City of Appleton
or ordinance is an issue we review de novo. Id. ¶13 We are satisfied that “as demonstrated and approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3255 - 2005-03-31
or ordinance is an issue we review de novo. Id. ¶13 We are satisfied that “as demonstrated and approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, not for evidence that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
, not for evidence that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45138 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Miller
to the defendant and not the “officers’ unarticulated plan.” Id. at 447. Here, Dahlgren never communicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
to the defendant and not the “officers’ unarticulated plan.” Id. at 447. Here, Dahlgren never communicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19