Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 511 - 520 of 82604 for case status.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s revised opinion was based upon the Old Chief line of cases, which hold that a court can direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24

[PDF] Frontsheet
2017 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1292-CR and 2015AP1293-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191653 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
determined that, as used in the Agreement, the phrase “entering retirement status” was ambiguous. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43059 - 2009-11-10

[PDF] NOTICE
retirement status” No. 2008AP1770 2 was ambiguous. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43059 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Christopher L. Ware
as to the definition of actual custody. We conclude that because Ware was under lawful arrest his status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14904 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert L. Sherry
2003 WI 123 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-0263-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16718 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert L. Sherry
2003 WI 123 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0263-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16718 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
2009 WI 48 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP1985 Complete Title: Ho-Chunk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36806 - 2009-06-15

[PDF] WI 48
2009 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2007AP1985 COMPLETE TITLE: Ho
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36806 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Susan M. Cotten
in the case. Although the client left numerous messages with Attorney Cotten inquiring about the status
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16413 - 2017-09-21