Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 511 - 520 of 29564 for er.
Search results 511 - 520 of 29564 for er.
State v. Mark Nelson
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clarence E. Hill
an excessive sentence; (2) the trial court erred in giving lesser-included offense jury instructions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8344 - 2005-03-31
an excessive sentence; (2) the trial court erred in giving lesser-included offense jury instructions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Nelson
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
court erred in computing restitution. “The determination of the amount of restitution to be ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
court erred in computing restitution. “The determination of the amount of restitution to be ordered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(10). Tyrone raises three issues on appeal. First, he argues that the court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902659 - 2025-01-22
(10). Tyrone raises three issues on appeal. First, he argues that the court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902659 - 2025-01-22
State v. Dale Iversen
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Iversen contends the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Iversen contends the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Hill
) the trial court erred in giving lesser-included offense jury instructions; (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court erred in giving lesser-included offense jury instructions; (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Martin C. H. v. Jill E. S.
decision; (4) erred when it refused to stay the order pending this appeal; and (5) erred by refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25682 - 2017-09-21
decision; (4) erred when it refused to stay the order pending this appeal; and (5) erred by refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25682 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dale Iversen
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Iversen contends the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14229 - 2005-05-09
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Iversen contends the trial court erred by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14229 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
WI App 30
Fernando2 raises three arguments on appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654464 - 2023-07-12
Fernando2 raises three arguments on appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654464 - 2023-07-12