Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 511 - 520 of 65039 for timed.

State v. Gerald P.
to proceed when it failed to hold a fact-finding hearing within the time required by statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20442 - 2006-02-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that his sentence be credited with the time he served in the custody of Oklahoma authorities. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291767 - 2020-09-29

[PDF] State v. Gerald P.
that the trial court lost competency to proceed when it failed to hold a fact-finding hearing within the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20442 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 20-09 - Comments from Brian A. Uhl, Chief of Public Safety, Ashwaubenon Dept. of Public Safety
as a whole has come to accept video technology as a standard method of communication. The timing is right
/supreme/docs/2009commentsuhl.pdf - 2021-03-01

[PDF] South Milwaukee Savings Bank v. John Barrett
of courts office violated § 806.10(3), STATS., by failing to docket, at the proper time, a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13440 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sons who were minors at the time of their divorce. As of that time, Mencel was employed as a truck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29

Burnett County Department of Human Services v. Tera L. R.
hearing was not held within the mandatory forty-five-day time limit provided by Wis. Stat. § 48.422(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20348 - 2005-11-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his petitions for sentence adjustment and positive adjustment time. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187331 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Burnett County Department of Human Services v. Tera L. R.
was not held within the mandatory forty-five-day time limit provided by WIS. STAT. § 48.422(2). This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20348 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
orders, trial courts that deviate from the statutory time requirements for responding to a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33413 - 2008-07-14