Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 511 - 520 of 21334 for warrants.
Search results 511 - 520 of 21334 for warrants.
State v. Jack P. Lindgren
) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(h)1. Lindgren contends that the warrant allowing the police to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6669 - 2005-03-31
) contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(h)1. Lindgren contends that the warrant allowing the police to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6669 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jack P. Lindgren
that the warrant allowing the police to search his home was illegal, and therefore the evidence discovered and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6668 - 2005-03-31
that the warrant allowing the police to search his home was illegal, and therefore the evidence discovered and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jack P. Lindgren
contends that the warrant allowing the police to search his home was illegal, and therefore the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6669 - 2017-09-20
contends that the warrant allowing the police to search his home was illegal, and therefore the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6669 - 2017-09-20
State v. Charles Jeremiah Jones
to a search warrant. Jones contends there was no probable cause to support the search warrant. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21563 - 2006-02-27
to a search warrant. Jones contends there was no probable cause to support the search warrant. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21563 - 2006-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seized from Burger’s vehicle without a warrant. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
seized from Burger’s vehicle without a warrant. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jeremiah Jones
in a search of his home, which was conducted pursuant to a search No. 2005AP2197-CR 2 warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21563 - 2017-09-21
in a search of his home, which was conducted pursuant to a search No. 2005AP2197-CR 2 warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
seized pursuant to a search warrant No. 2009AP2532-CR 2 and when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53539 - 2014-09-15
seized pursuant to a search warrant No. 2009AP2532-CR 2 and when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53539 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony Howard
that the facts alleged by Howard are insufficient to warrant relief. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6247 - 2005-03-31
that the facts alleged by Howard are insufficient to warrant relief. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6247 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to a search warrant and when it denied his motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23
pursuant to a search warrant and when it denied his motion for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pursuant to and within the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117806 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to and within the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117806 - 2017-09-21