Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5101 - 5110 of 41465 for she.
Search results 5101 - 5110 of 41465 for she.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would impact a person’s intelligence and/or ability to reason or make decisions.” She also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136500 - 2017-09-21
would impact a person’s intelligence and/or ability to reason or make decisions.” She also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jane Barry v. Maple Bluff Country Club
that Barry failed to state a claim for false advertising and for constitutional violations; that she waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12207 - 2017-09-21
that Barry failed to state a claim for false advertising and for constitutional violations; that she waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Martha J. Crunk v. Conservatorship of Mabel A.O.
in Martha’s brief and makes essentially the same arguments that she does. We reject their arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15221 - 2017-09-21
in Martha’s brief and makes essentially the same arguments that she does. We reject their arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15221 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support a jury verdict in favor of the termination ground. She also contends that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70054 - 2011-08-16
was insufficient to support a jury verdict in favor of the termination ground. She also contends that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70054 - 2011-08-16
[PDF]
Mabel A.O. v. Conservatorship of Mabel A.O.
in Martha’s brief and makes essentially the same arguments that she does. We reject their arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15169 - 2017-09-21
in Martha’s brief and makes essentially the same arguments that she does. We reject their arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
committed an appealable legal error.” Because she fails to identify how the court erred, she also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
committed an appealable legal error.” Because she fails to identify how the court erred, she also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
State v. Basil Richmond
statements about whether she was a virgin at the time they occurred. Richmond contends that this testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14113 - 2005-03-31
statements about whether she was a virgin at the time they occurred. Richmond contends that this testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3125 - 2017-09-19
and continued to preside over the cases. In the alternative, she argues that the ultimate disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3125 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
her motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. She contends her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34301 - 2008-10-14
her motion for postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. She contends her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34301 - 2008-10-14
State v. Sebastian Molina
objected to Laufenberg’s testimony as improper expert opinion. She testified that the victim tolerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31
objected to Laufenberg’s testimony as improper expert opinion. She testified that the victim tolerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31