Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51011 - 51020 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 51011 - 51020 of 60183 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Mark Nelson
that this had become a “high crime area” because of the prowler attacks, but claims that the deputy’s belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15564 - 2005-03-31
that this had become a “high crime area” because of the prowler attacks, but claims that the deputy’s belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15564 - 2005-03-31
State v. James S. Poehlman
de novo review. Id. at 639. In reviewing a claimed jury instruction error, we do not review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18632 - 2005-06-20
de novo review. Id. at 639. In reviewing a claimed jury instruction error, we do not review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18632 - 2005-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
against the Bloomers. The County dropped its claim for any forfeitures and the circuit court issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29414 - 2007-06-18
against the Bloomers. The County dropped its claim for any forfeitures and the circuit court issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29414 - 2007-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
foreclosure claim. ¶2 DAC and the Collettis (collectively, the Collettis) appeal the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128650 - 2014-11-18
foreclosure claim. ¶2 DAC and the Collettis (collectively, the Collettis) appeal the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128650 - 2014-11-18
State v. Thomas E. Dahl
consent was coerced, this assertion relies on Dahl’s claim that Wis. Stat. § 343.305 is unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31
consent was coerced, this assertion relies on Dahl’s claim that Wis. Stat. § 343.305 is unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sean R. Haverty
claims that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest him for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
claims that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest him for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 806.07(1)(a). Although the court did not directly address Kenneth’s “mistake” claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111386 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 806.07(1)(a). Although the court did not directly address Kenneth’s “mistake” claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111386 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher L. Russell
of an information. The Woehrer court, in fact, noted: “There is no claim that the defendant waived such filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3958 - 2005-03-31
of an information. The Woehrer court, in fact, noted: “There is no claim that the defendant waived such filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3958 - 2005-03-31
March Table of unpublished opinions
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34 - 2005-03-31
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. And their claim that they never got the notice is hard to believe … I find they at least certainly had notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
. And their claim that they never got the notice is hard to believe … I find they at least certainly had notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22