Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51021 - 51030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51021 - 51030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Debbra MacDonald v. American National Property and Casualty Company
dismissed from the case. American National filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Edmund
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5006 - 2017-09-19
dismissed from the case. American National filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that Edmund
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5006 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
began the decision section of its July 6, 2012 order by stating: “The parties agree that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
began the decision section of its July 6, 2012 order by stating: “The parties agree that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George G. Kidd
, the impeachment Kidd requests would have been of marginal value. Second, the prosecutor in Kidd's case refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19
, the impeachment Kidd requests would have been of marginal value. Second, the prosecutor in Kidd's case refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The following facts were testified to by the only witness at the suppression hearing in this case, Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
The following facts were testified to by the only witness at the suppression hearing in this case, Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84134 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the lawsuits are different, and this case falls under exceptions to the general rule of claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46416 - 2014-09-15
of the lawsuits are different, and this case falls under exceptions to the general rule of claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46416 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles Rogers
after the fact in a completely unrelated case, was not a fact that would result in an acquittal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6538 - 2017-09-19
after the fact in a completely unrelated case, was not a fact that would result in an acquittal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6538 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
no contest plea testified that Penigar adamantly opposed taking his case to trial. They testified that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
no contest plea testified that Penigar adamantly opposed taking his case to trial. They testified that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
charges in this case plus a bail-jumping charge in another case as part of the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95275 - 2013-04-07
charges in this case plus a bail-jumping charge in another case as part of the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95275 - 2013-04-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Tort law applies to civil cases, not criminal cases. Kroening’s argument does not provide grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180513 - 2017-09-21
. Tort law applies to civil cases, not criminal cases. Kroening’s argument does not provide grounds
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180513 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the other cases were not available to the court at the time of sentencing. However, the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86146 - 2014-09-15
the other cases were not available to the court at the time of sentencing. However, the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86146 - 2014-09-15