Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51071 - 51080 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51071 - 51080 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a pseudonym, rather than her initials or name. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479309 - 2022-01-28
a pseudonym, rather than her initials or name. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479309 - 2022-01-28
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry Luckett
on the charges related to the incident in this case, the State moved to dismiss the obstructing charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12593 - 2017-09-21
on the charges related to the incident in this case, the State moved to dismiss the obstructing charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Suzette M. Ward
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2530-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14446 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2530-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14446 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
) (citation omitted). That is the case here. Bowmar’s arguments on appeal challenge the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
) (citation omitted). That is the case here. Bowmar’s arguments on appeal challenge the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction, both directly and indirectly.[1] ¶4 In the case before us now, Heimermann, who is still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34930 - 2008-12-17
conviction, both directly and indirectly.[1] ¶4 In the case before us now, Heimermann, who is still
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34930 - 2008-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that Harlan’s fingerprints were on the gun found at the scene and that seven shell casings found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34164 - 2008-09-30
testified that Harlan’s fingerprints were on the gun found at the scene and that seven shell casings found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34164 - 2008-09-30
Nathan Gillis v. Gary McCaughtry
they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. See Dunn, 213 Wis.2d at 368, 570 N.W.2d at 617
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13957 - 2005-03-31
they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. See Dunn, 213 Wis.2d at 368, 570 N.W.2d at 617
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review ¶7 This case arises out of the trial court’s decision on a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36997 - 2014-09-15
. DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review ¶7 This case arises out of the trial court’s decision on a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36997 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ray A. Schiller
2003 WI App 195 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2963
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5854 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 195 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2963
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5854 - 2017-09-19