Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51071 - 51080 of 59547 for do.

State v. James D. Turner, Jr.
for something he did not do, so he would take the five-year plea bargain. He testified that he never agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8077 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether he has been denied good time credit, we decline to do so. The record does not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21

Peter J. Mehler v. The State of Wisconsin Examing Board of Social Workers
. Code §§ SFC 14.01 and 14.02 do not support Mehler's reading of the statute. These code sections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10072 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Here, Cornejo’s pleadings do not sufficiently demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the current
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03

Laverne McCoy v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioner for the City of Milwaukee
the accumulated test score for a test or a section thereof. We do note the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9549 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 05-01 Amendment to Supreme Court Rules relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System (Effective 7-1-06)
allegations established. I do not entirely disagree with that practice. I have previously stated
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24996 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Harbor. Moreover, were we to conclude that Bump identified a new factor—and we do not—we would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235089 - 2019-02-13

COURT OF APPEALS
, Franklin alleges deficient performance but fails to explain how his defense was prejudiced; he must do both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107820 - 2014-02-11

[PDF] State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
in the original sentencing, we do not believe a formal diagnosis constitutes a new factor. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4660 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Patrick M. Curran v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
that the Currans were now seeking review of the zoning administrator’s decision, but the time for doing so had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3527 - 2017-09-19