Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51091 - 51100 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51091 - 51100 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this case was not responsibly prosecuted.” The court concluded that the “overwhelming evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173362 - 2017-09-21
that this case was not responsibly prosecuted.” The court concluded that the “overwhelming evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173362 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
case for a 9mm handgun. Bullet fragments showed the dogs were shot by a .22 caliber gun. In a storage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42109 - 2009-10-13
case for a 9mm handgun. Bullet fragments showed the dogs were shot by a .22 caliber gun. In a storage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42109 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suggested that the State charged the wrong person when it accused him of the crimes in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
suggested that the State charged the wrong person when it accused him of the crimes in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
[PDF]
State v. James B. Smits
2001 WI App 45 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1158-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2550 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 45 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1158-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2550 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
); and 1 Because Linzy committed the crimes in this case when the 2015-16 Wisconsin Statutes were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251811 - 2019-12-23
); and 1 Because Linzy committed the crimes in this case when the 2015-16 Wisconsin Statutes were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251811 - 2019-12-23
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
the parties was unsuccessful, and the case was going to be tried in July. The trial court required all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
the parties was unsuccessful, and the case was going to be tried in July. The trial court required all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua T. Howard
Automation Program, does not specify any criminal convictions—it merely lists case captions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6577 - 2017-09-19
Automation Program, does not specify any criminal convictions—it merely lists case captions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6577 - 2017-09-19
Steven J. Schuette v. Rebecca C. Gross-Schuette
on alternating Saturdays. Rebecca appealed. We remanded the case to the trial court for additional findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26309 - 2006-08-29
on alternating Saturdays. Rebecca appealed. We remanded the case to the trial court for additional findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26309 - 2006-08-29
State v. Adam Procell
or circumstantial evidence case. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis.2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752, 755 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11980 - 2005-03-31
or circumstantial evidence case. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis.2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752, 755 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is material to an issue in the No. 2010AP1220-CR 4 case; and (4) the evidence is not merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62515 - 2014-09-15
is material to an issue in the No. 2010AP1220-CR 4 case; and (4) the evidence is not merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62515 - 2014-09-15