Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5111 - 5120 of 36260 for Name: Professional.

[PDF] State v. Eric P. Russell
against the “strong presumption that counsel acted reasonably within professional norms.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8409 - 2017-09-19

State v. Adan Castellano
, in counsel's professional judgment, Castellano was likely to be convicted by a jury of first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9537 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
that it is professional misconduct to "commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18808 - 2005-06-28

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas A. Fadner
A. Fadner, II to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for nine months for professional misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21510 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SCR CHAPTER 13
sub. (1), constitutes professional misconduct and may be grounds for disciplinary action under
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32241 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Keith Beauchamp
to overcome a strong presumption that counsel acted reasonably within professional norms.” Johnson, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20867 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the Department of Health and Family Services, who testified that it was her professional opinion that McGee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85185 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stacy Michelle Rios
in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The referee's recommendation was for a 60- day suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16834 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
must show counsel’s specific acts or omissions were “outside the wide range of professionally competent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69575 - 2011-08-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas A. Fadner
for professional misconduct, and that he be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. Attorney Fadner's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21510 - 2006-02-23