Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5111 - 5120 of 55789 for n y c.
Search results 5111 - 5120 of 55789 for n y c.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up,” was not the answer counsel wanted, but judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
at the suppression hearing that “[m]y streets were mixed up,” was not the answer counsel wanted, but judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the PSI report. The circuit court said: “[B]y the way, as I go past here, the Static- 99R indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398591 - 2021-07-28
at the PSI report. The circuit court said: “[B]y the way, as I go past here, the Static- 99R indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398591 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
to providing a DNA sample and paying the surcharge, the trial court stated: “[Y]ou are required to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
to providing a DNA sample and paying the surcharge, the trial court stated: “[Y]ou are required to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court stated: “[Y]ou are required to provide a DNA sample if you have not previously provided one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27
, the trial court stated: “[Y]ou are required to provide a DNA sample if you have not previously provided one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92? A. No. Q. Is that a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92? A. No. Q. Is that a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
Helen Sramek v. James G. Korth
N O T I C E 96-1667 Helen Sramek v. James G. Korth Please be advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10945 - 2017-09-19
N O T I C E 96-1667 Helen Sramek v. James G. Korth Please be advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10945 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Aurora Loan Services, Inc. v. John A. Owen
N O T I C E 00-0786 Aurora Loan Services v. John A. Owen Please be advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2415 - 2017-09-19
N O T I C E 00-0786 Aurora Loan Services v. John A. Owen Please be advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2415 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Vacate-Withdrawn
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS N O T I C E 2018AP1804 Deutsche
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254290 - 2020-03-02
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS N O T I C E 2018AP1804 Deutsche
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254290 - 2020-03-02
[PDF]
State v. Lance Terry Konrath
. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case is on review from an unpublished decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17110 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case is on review from an unpublished decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17110 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lance Terry Konrath
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17110 - 2005-03-31