Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51141 - 51150 of 82664 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51141 - 51150 of 82664 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Dean A. Molzner
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV CASE NO. 99-0311-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15090 - 2017-09-21
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV CASE NO. 99-0311-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15090 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
to dismiss the case when the State failed to meet its burden with respect to the element of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28010 - 2007-02-05
to dismiss the case when the State failed to meet its burden with respect to the element of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28010 - 2007-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authority to recall the case on its own. ¶2 We agree that it would have been within the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248083 - 2019-10-09
authority to recall the case on its own. ¶2 We agree that it would have been within the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248083 - 2019-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements, the Estate’s counsel told the jury that it would hear “a lot of dates in this case,” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212429 - 2018-05-08
statements, the Estate’s counsel told the jury that it would hear “a lot of dates in this case,” because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212429 - 2018-05-08
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
) (citation omitted). That is the case here. Bowmar’s arguments on appeal challenge the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31
) (citation omitted). That is the case here. Bowmar’s arguments on appeal challenge the trial court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Circuit Court denied Undraitis’s suppression motion. ¶6 The case proceeded to a jury trial and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142334 - 2017-09-21
Circuit Court denied Undraitis’s suppression motion. ¶6 The case proceeded to a jury trial and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J. This is a governmental contractor immunity case in which we conclude that an electrical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137010 - 2017-09-21
, P.J. This is a governmental contractor immunity case in which we conclude that an electrical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 48
2016 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2015AP1501-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168116 - 2017-09-21
2016 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2015AP1501-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the following rules shall be followed: (6) In the case of a partial taking of property other than an easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15
, the following rules shall be followed: (6) In the case of a partial taking of property other than an easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case before us, and neither do we. No. 2012AP435 5 which negligence on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92858 - 2014-09-15
the case before us, and neither do we. No. 2012AP435 5 which negligence on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92858 - 2014-09-15