Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51141 - 51150 of 83088 for simple case search.

State v. James E. Gray
crimes to get drugs in the past. Prior to the offenses involved in this case, he had been caught
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14819 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Bayfield v. Andrew J. Peterson
in the case. The trial court conducted the refusal hearing and trial on the OWI charge at the same time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9962 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James R. Beckerson
for revocation. In this case, the court signed the order without indicating whether probation was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7036 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. See Grotelueschen v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 171 Wis. 2d 437, 447, 492 N.W.2d 131 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122262 - 2014-09-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 The judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317187 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] State v. Tony G. Merriweather
conclusively established that Merriweather was entitled to no relief. The law of the case precludes us from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12558 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“the primary issue to be decided by the court in this case is one of statutory interpretation.” Lukanich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126124 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted Rochelle’s voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3704 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted Rochelle’s voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3705 - 2017-09-19

Lori Kaiser v. Village of Hartland
the judgment with respect to the declaration challenged in the cross-appeal. We remand the case for entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14473 - 2009-07-27