Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51161 - 51170 of 59016 for do.
Search results 51161 - 51170 of 59016 for do.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 motion without a hearing.4 In doing so, the trial court recognized that our decision affirming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
. § 974.06 motion without a hearing.4 In doing so, the trial court recognized that our decision affirming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
[PDF]
State v. Justin F.
or developmentally disabled. Here, the court stated, “You are not developmentally disabled; although, you do have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12443 - 2017-09-21
or developmentally disabled. Here, the court stated, “You are not developmentally disabled; although, you do have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to explain why he did not do so.4 As noted above, § 974.06 requires a “prisoner to raise all grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50732 - 2014-09-15
to explain why he did not do so.4 As noted above, § 974.06 requires a “prisoner to raise all grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50732 - 2014-09-15
State v. Neil Montoto
court granted Montoto’s request to do so. ¶19 Based on these facts, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5371 - 2005-03-31
court granted Montoto’s request to do so. ¶19 Based on these facts, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5371 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court, we do not grant Miller the relief he seeks. However, we note that in a similar case, where we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2014-06-04
court, we do not grant Miller the relief he seeks. However, we note that in a similar case, where we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113843 - 2014-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not identical in fact—they were separated by over six months—and thus they do not violate double jeopardy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848337 - 2024-09-10
not identical in fact—they were separated by over six months—and thus they do not violate double jeopardy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848337 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
would decide what to do during that time as far as child care was concerned. Nothing in the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144517 - 2015-07-15
would decide what to do during that time as far as child care was concerned. Nothing in the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144517 - 2015-07-15
State v. Romel D.
. was carrying a weapon, and he repeatedly asked: “Is it a gun? What is it? What do you have on you?” Romel D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
. was carrying a weapon, and he repeatedly asked: “Is it a gun? What is it? What do you have on you?” Romel D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15775 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
do “at least twenty years.” The fourth interview was on October 10, 2000, at 11:54 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
do “at least twenty years.” The fourth interview was on October 10, 2000, at 11:54 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32128 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
joined in that motion, and Leonard makes no effort to explain why he did not do so.[4] As noted above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07
joined in that motion, and Leonard makes no effort to explain why he did not do so.[4] As noted above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50733 - 2010-06-07