Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51191 - 51200 of 56214 for n y c.
Search results 51191 - 51200 of 56214 for n y c.
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing: [C]ertainly someone’s conduct while out on bail or conduct in the jail if they’re incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
at sentencing: [C]ertainly someone’s conduct while out on bail or conduct in the jail if they’re incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56614 - 2010-11-16
State v. Scott W. Nagel
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2005-03-31
, as a habitual criminal, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 948.03(3)(c) and 939.62(1)(b).[1] Nagel argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy S. Duckart
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c). Additionally, all further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3254 - 2017-09-19
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c). Additionally, all further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3254 - 2017-09-19
Michael W. Gragg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
coverage under s. 632.32(5)(b), (c) or (f) to (j). 632.32 Provisions of motor vehicle insurance policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3519 - 2005-03-31
coverage under s. 632.32(5)(b), (c) or (f) to (j). 632.32 Provisions of motor vehicle insurance policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3519 - 2005-03-31
West Bend Mutual Ins. Co. v. Stacy L. Stegner
C. Possi of Mueller, Goss & Possi, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15756 - 2005-03-31
C. Possi of Mueller, Goss & Possi, S.C., Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he was to “[c]ommit no new law violations arising to the level of probable cause,” the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162256 - 2017-09-21
that he was to “[c]ommit no new law violations arising to the level of probable cause,” the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was “barred” from arguing that he was not responsible for these payments because “[c]onsistently since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843830 - 2024-08-29
was “barred” from arguing that he was not responsible for these payments because “[c]onsistently since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843830 - 2024-08-29
State v. Luis E. Hernandez
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3106 - 2005-03-31
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2017-18). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297757 - 2020-10-21
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2017-18). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297757 - 2020-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
“at the scene of the shooting at the time of the shooting.” C. Surviving Victim’s Prior Convictions. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74181 - 2011-11-21
“at the scene of the shooting at the time of the shooting.” C. Surviving Victim’s Prior Convictions. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74181 - 2011-11-21