Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 72350 for alle.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 72350 for alle.
State v. Dexter Tolefree
, removing all references to drug analysis costs as restitution. No other issues were raised in that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
, removing all references to drug analysis costs as restitution. No other issues were raised in that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian M.
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6459 - 2005-03-31
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6459 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian M.
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6457 - 2005-03-31
court extended Davis’s probation for the collection of outstanding restitution despite the fact that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6457 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodger A. Dierks
on seven counts of making threats of harm over the telephone.[2] Dierks pled guilty to all seven counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9415 - 2005-03-31
on seven counts of making threats of harm over the telephone.[2] Dierks pled guilty to all seven counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1997-98). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2687 - 2017-09-19
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1997-98). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2687 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2015-16). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206092 - 2017-12-27
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2015-16). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206092 - 2017-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
All of Mitchell’s arguments are based on a legal theory of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
All of Mitchell’s arguments are based on a legal theory of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
Kay & Andersen v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.
on all issues. ¶2 Kay & Andersen is a Madison law firm. Its office manager, Ida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7482 - 2005-03-31
on all issues. ¶2 Kay & Andersen is a Madison law firm. Its office manager, Ida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7482 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(2015-16). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206695 - 2018-01-09
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(2015-16). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206695 - 2018-01-09
Barbara J. Chariton v. Saturn Corporation
of $20,170.75.[2] Saturn’s letter also stated: “By accepting this offer Ms. Chariton agrees to complete all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15224 - 2005-03-31
of $20,170.75.[2] Saturn’s letter also stated: “By accepting this offer Ms. Chariton agrees to complete all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15224 - 2005-03-31