Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 30012 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
is final for purposes of judicial review is a question of law, which we review de novo. Sierra Club, 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79522 - 2012-03-14

[PDF] Frontsheet
the disposition of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology the circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237774 - 2019-05-30

State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
review de novo, independently of the reasoning of the circuit court and court of appeals, but benefiting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16800 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barron Electric Cooperative v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
disagreed. Employing a de novo standard of review, the court concluded that neither utility could serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12077 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that are reviewed de novo. See State v. Alger, 2015 WI 3, ¶21, 360 Wis. 2d 193, 858 N.W.2d 346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229978 - 2018-12-11

Frontsheet
that this court reviews de novo. See Leitinger, 302 Wis. 2d 110, ¶20. ¶13 The second question we must answer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79240 - 2012-03-06

[PDF] CenturyTel of the Midwest-Kendall, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
, which are questions of law, subject to our de novo review. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4810 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
We review a circuit court’s decision to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219082 - 2019-01-29

[PDF] WI APP 41
and Applicable Law ¶10 The standard of review for questions of summary judgment is de novo. Goudy v. Yamaha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79489 - 2014-09-15

City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
: "[A] motion made at the close of the plaintiff's case does not allow for a trial de novo in the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16780 - 2005-03-31