Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

David J. Geisler v. Marc S. Baldwin
of law that we review de novo. See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Owen, 191 Wis. 2d 744, 747, 530 N.W.2d 51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5618 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffery R. Janda
. Angiolo, 186 Wis. 2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App. 1994). We decide de novo whether, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7637 - 2014-03-11

State v. Lawrence J. Van Boxtel
reviews a probable cause determination de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16006 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
courts review de novo. And he also properly cites Weiss v. Regent Properties, Ltd., 118 Wis. 2d 225, 229
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6142 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for Grant County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46658 - 2010-02-03

State v. Jerome M. Wywial
principles to undisputed facts, the issue will be reviewed de novo. State v. Pheil, 152 Wis.2d 523, 529, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10813 - 2008-12-10

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30077 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Visnaw
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8952 - 2013-02-21

State v. Robert Stannard
commission of the felony. Id. On review of a probable cause determination, we review the evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mario F. Blasnig
a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10263 - 2005-03-31