Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 57201 for id.

[PDF] State v. Gerald D. Schrank
tried; the second category covers cases where justice has miscarried. Id. In a “miscarriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20

State v. Rosemarie Parsons
of the case.” Id. at 694. The ultimate determination whether counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3894 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s error is “fundamental” or “technical.” Id., ¶24. A fundamental error is one that is “basic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232741 - 2019-01-15

[PDF] NOTICE
that they were required to find the value of the property subject to the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
to this “alternative test” as the “second” test or “additional test.” Id. We use the term “additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28954 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
not raised first in the trial court will generally not be properly preserved for appeal. Id., ¶10. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07

[PDF] NOTICE
findings of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Whether those facts constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32740 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.’” Id., ¶20 (citation omitted). The strong presumption is that counsel rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35903 - 2009-03-17

State v. John W. Page
of a dangerous weapon. Id. The jury was instructed that if it was “satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See id. at 520. The court therefore denied Flowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13