Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 72987 for we.
Search results 5121 - 5130 of 72987 for we.
State v. Russell Martin
is whether Martin was denied ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15182 - 2005-03-31
is whether Martin was denied ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude that Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 58
to him because he is a nonviolent felon. We hold that the ban on felons possessing firearms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80525 - 2014-09-15
to him because he is a nonviolent felon. We hold that the ban on felons possessing firearms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80525 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dann P. Knippel
search of his vehicle to which he did not consent. As to Knippel’s first argument, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11164 - 2017-09-19
search of his vehicle to which he did not consent. As to Knippel’s first argument, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11164 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
at the jury trial. Applying current other acts law, we conclude that the evidence was admissible to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11217 - 2017-09-19
at the jury trial. Applying current other acts law, we conclude that the evidence was admissible to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11217 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to law and that the Board erred when it affirmed the assessment. Because we conclude that the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28825 - 2007-05-01
to law and that the Board erred when it affirmed the assessment. Because we conclude that the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28825 - 2007-05-01
[PDF]
Pam Anita Cook v. Roger Paul Cook
rules to stipulated facts, it is a question of law which we review independently, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9384 - 2017-09-19
rules to stipulated facts, it is a question of law which we review independently, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Charles Chvala v. Danford C. Bubolz
. We conclude that the statute upon No. 95-3120 -2- which the Chief of the Patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
. We conclude that the statute upon No. 95-3120 -2- which the Chief of the Patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9951 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Worden
the Huber law, we affirm those parts of the court’s judgment. However, because the sheriff, not the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2116 - 2017-09-19
the Huber law, we affirm those parts of the court’s judgment. However, because the sheriff, not the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Anthuber
- promised to provide. We hold, however, that Anthuber was not entitled to this defense because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9068 - 2017-09-19
- promised to provide. We hold, however, that Anthuber was not entitled to this defense because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9068 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to a trial court decision for which we requested clarification. We ordered a limited remand to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33703 - 2008-08-12
to a trial court decision for which we requested clarification. We ordered a limited remand to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33703 - 2008-08-12