Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51211 - 51220 of 68814 for had.
Search results 51211 - 51220 of 68814 for had.
State v. Leon R. McQueen
which they gave McQueen to sign advised him that he had the right to refuse consent and that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13628 - 2005-03-31
which they gave McQueen to sign advised him that he had the right to refuse consent and that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13628 - 2005-03-31
Zettie Nicks v. George A. Nicks
to be considered the separate property of George, even though they had been acquired by the parties during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9440 - 2005-03-31
to be considered the separate property of George, even though they had been acquired by the parties during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lamont Thao v. Paul Christianson
he had waited long enough. According to Christianson, Thao said he did not want his cracked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6976 - 2017-09-20
he had waited long enough. According to Christianson, Thao said he did not want his cracked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6976 - 2017-09-20
City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
of the circumstances to determine whether the officer reasonably suspected that the defendant had committed an offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31
of the circumstances to determine whether the officer reasonably suspected that the defendant had committed an offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
meaning of a de novo hearing is ‘[a] new hearing of a matter, conducted as if the original hearing had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52539 - 2010-07-26
meaning of a de novo hearing is ‘[a] new hearing of a matter, conducted as if the original hearing had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52539 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruled that Soderlund had no right to de novo review under WIS. STAT. § 799.207(2) because he requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699750 - 2023-09-06
ruled that Soderlund had no right to de novo review under WIS. STAT. § 799.207(2) because he requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699750 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the new misdemeanor charges, which Robinson had not posted.2 The battery charge was eventually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
of the new misdemeanor charges, which Robinson had not posted.2 The battery charge was eventually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315643 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on a police investigation indicating that Stuhr had intentionally damaged property Stuhr had rented from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144916 - 2017-09-21
on a police investigation indicating that Stuhr had intentionally damaged property Stuhr had rented from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144916 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the offense and the need to protect the public, given that he had a prior similar offense and had been through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144292 - 2015-07-14
of the offense and the need to protect the public, given that he had a prior similar offense and had been through
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144292 - 2015-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
trespass as a repeater. All told, Olsen could have received well over twenty-six more years of prison, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
trespass as a repeater. All told, Olsen could have received well over twenty-six more years of prison, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08