Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51271 - 51280 of 59767 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] State v. Christopher S. Oglesby
factor. There is no merit to a claim that Oglesby was sentenced on inaccurate information about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5299 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rodney R. Clark
to the plea, including claims of constitutional error, this court has recognized that “double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to claims that Smith’s pleas were anything other than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747657 - 2024-01-09

State v. Kenneth Moffett
at that time, claiming that he was never alone in his bedroom with the victim. Counsel has no obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15969 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of sentencing, the facts are not new factors if the defendant does not claim to have been unaware of them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854290 - 2024-09-26

City of New London v. James E. Knaus
agree and conclude that the effect of the stipulation was to waive any claim that the test result should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4809 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc. v. Marvelle Enterprises of America, Inc.
on HBPS. No. 95-0947 -22- Marvelle also claims that Hamilton Beach's motion in limine
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8873 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert H. Wichman
present even a prima facie claim for relief. By the Court.—Judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11069 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2021AP1930-CRNM 5 376 Wis. 2d 644, ¶1. Any claim that trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757216 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] La Crosse County v. Thomas J. Breidel
motion, he would have waived this claimed defect. County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d 431, 437, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5195 - 2017-09-19