Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51271 - 51280 of 83988 for simple case search.
Search results 51271 - 51280 of 83988 for simple case search.
State v. Mark R. McNamee
lost jurisdiction when his probation term expired. He bases his argument on several cases dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15282 - 2005-03-31
lost jurisdiction when his probation term expired. He bases his argument on several cases dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Anthony M. Johnson, Attorney at Law
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 86-0607-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16845 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 86-0607-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jerome Foods, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
argues that Strzyzewski failed to prove a prima facie case that she applied for rehire and her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2904 - 2017-09-19
argues that Strzyzewski failed to prove a prima facie case that she applied for rehire and her employer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2904 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 FINE, J. This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
. ¶1 FINE, J. This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties agree that the sentencing transcript in Porter’s case does not show that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04
The parties agree that the sentencing transcript in Porter’s case does not show that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04
May a judge meet in chambers with a representative of a special interest group without violating the Code of Judicial Ethics?
wishes to discuss any pending case. However, like many court dockets in the state, the judge always has
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31
wishes to discuss any pending case. However, like many court dockets in the state, the judge always has
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-82, 246 N.W.2d 521 (1976). In this case, the Paulys do not dispute either the Village’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101949 - 2017-09-21
-82, 246 N.W.2d 521 (1976). In this case, the Paulys do not dispute either the Village’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
COURT OF APPEALS
for battery. Tuckwab defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143490 - 2015-06-29
for battery. Tuckwab defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143490 - 2015-06-29