Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 11927 for affidavit.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 11927 for affidavit.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
guilty plea. ¶26 Prior to November 13, 2007, Attorney Carroll prepared an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105948 - 2017-09-21
guilty plea. ¶26 Prior to November 13, 2007, Attorney Carroll prepared an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105948 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
to November 13, 2007, Attorney Carroll prepared an affidavit for the signature of government witness P.E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18
to November 13, 2007, Attorney Carroll prepared an affidavit for the signature of government witness P.E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18
Andrea Driver v. Housing Authority of Racine County
Housing to ask about the termination letter. ¶8 Getman’s affidavit states that she informed Bizzle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21280 - 2006-03-22
Housing to ask about the termination letter. ¶8 Getman’s affidavit states that she informed Bizzle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21280 - 2006-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
that the affidavit provided by Harris, which Alexander offers as new evidence, is insufficient to warrant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82144 - 2012-05-07
that the affidavit provided by Harris, which Alexander offers as new evidence, is insufficient to warrant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82144 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit. The motion was based on Khan’s failure to cooperate with Attorney Nash. Attorney Nash’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-23
affidavit. The motion was based on Khan’s failure to cooperate with Attorney Nash. Attorney Nash’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the affidavit provided by Harris, which Alexander offers as new evidence, is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82144 - 2014-09-15
conclude that the affidavit provided by Harris, which Alexander offers as new evidence, is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82144 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lee R. Krahenbuhl v. Wisconsin Dentistry Examining Board
testimony and the affidavits of his expert, Terry Kippa, D.D.S. In addition, both parties utilized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6994 - 2017-09-20
testimony and the affidavits of his expert, Terry Kippa, D.D.S. In addition, both parties utilized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6994 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit he signed to the complaint. Pertinent to this case, Roupas averred that he “purchased or arranged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
an affidavit he signed to the complaint. Pertinent to this case, Roupas averred that he “purchased or arranged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial based on newly discovered evidence. Specifically, Yoakum relies on an affidavit from Brandon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613971 - 2023-01-26
trial based on newly discovered evidence. Specifically, Yoakum relies on an affidavit from Brandon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613971 - 2023-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit and testimony showed that, although Reetz had no specific recollection of or record of discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89657 - 2011-04-20
affidavit and testimony showed that, although Reetz had no specific recollection of or record of discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89657 - 2011-04-20