Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 83320 for case search.

[PDF] State v. Scott D. Nash
). An arresting officer, or in this case the detaining agent, may then search the detained person and his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14652 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dennis E. Jones
drugs from a visitor. A few days later, just after Jones had a visitor, an officer searched him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12203 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dennis E. Jones
illegal drugs from a visitor. A few days later, just after Jones had a visitor, an officer searched him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12203 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott D. Nash
, or in this case the detaining agent, may then search the detained person and his or her immediate surrounding area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14652 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. However, that case involves an officer who found drugs on a defendant after conducting a frisk search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80135 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
for controlled substances. Thornborrow and Prey had the occupants exit the vehicle. The officers searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80135 - 2012-03-26

State v. Christopher V. Teague
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case is whether drug evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christopher V. Teague
a judgment of conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore has not triggered the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105544 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105544 - 2013-12-16