Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 57351 for id.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of those facts to constitutional principles. See id. No. 2018AP920-CR 4 ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238427 - 2019-04-02
the application of those facts to constitutional principles. See id. No. 2018AP920-CR 4 ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238427 - 2019-04-02
[PDF]
State v. Brandon E. Jones
of the offense, (2) the character of the offender, and (3) the need to protect the public. See id. at 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20077 - 2017-09-21
of the offense, (2) the character of the offender, and (3) the need to protect the public. See id. at 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20077 - 2017-09-21
State v. William D. Taylor
to preserve the testimony of trial counsel.” Id. The hearing is important not only to give trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31
to preserve the testimony of trial counsel.” Id. The hearing is important not only to give trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3823 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.’” Id., ¶20 (citation omitted). The strong presumption is that counsel rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35903 - 2009-03-17
in the outcome.’” Id., ¶20 (citation omitted). The strong presumption is that counsel rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35903 - 2009-03-17
[PDF]
State v. John W. Page
with intent to deliver while in possession of a dangerous weapon. Id. The jury was instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15814 - 2017-09-21
with intent to deliver while in possession of a dangerous weapon. Id. The jury was instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15814 - 2017-09-21
Bank One v. Gregg A. Koch
to award such fees is not implied from statutes that authorize other forms of relief.” Id. at 101-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4294 - 2005-03-31
to award such fees is not implied from statutes that authorize other forms of relief.” Id. at 101-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected United America’s claim under § 32.18. Id., ¶¶1, 22. After recognizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
. The Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected United America’s claim under § 32.18. Id., ¶¶1, 22. After recognizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
to this “alternative test” as the “second” test or “additional test.” Id. We use the term “additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28954 - 2014-09-15
to this “alternative test” as the “second” test or “additional test.” Id. We use the term “additional test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28954 - 2014-09-15
Certification
institutional confinement.” Id. at 1194. The district court further concluded that “[the] plaintiff’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33811 - 2008-08-20
institutional confinement.” Id. at 1194. The district court further concluded that “[the] plaintiff’s
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33811 - 2008-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
was not tried and there was a miscarriage of justice. See id. We rejected his arguments and affirmed. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
was not tried and there was a miscarriage of justice. See id. We rejected his arguments and affirmed. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09