Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Douglas J. Miller
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject Miller’s argument. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 59
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
). ¶35 LaCount argues that the search and seizure in the present case violated the prohibition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33001 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
may be seized." Id. (citation omitted). ¶42 The DeSmidt case dealt with "whether the search of Dr
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09
may be seized." Id. (citation omitted). ¶42 The DeSmidt case dealt with "whether the search of Dr
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33001 - 2008-06-09
[PDF]
State v. David W. Oakley
are interesting because it was a Wisconsin case, its holding is not implicated here for the simple reason
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17587 - 2017-09-21
are interesting because it was a Wisconsin case, its holding is not implicated here for the simple reason
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17587 - 2017-09-21
State v. Penny L. Swanson
. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, she challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8845 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, she challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8845 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Penny L. Swanson
challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search warrant and suppress evidence gathered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
challenges the trial court's refusal to quash a search warrant and suppress evidence gathered as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
.[2] However, these cases do not address the issue of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
.[2] However, these cases do not address the issue of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude this case is controlled by State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶¶20-22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
of consent to search. ¶7 We conclude this case is controlled by State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶¶20-22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to search the vehicle; and relating to the reckless homicide charge, he sought suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564578 - 2022-09-13
to search the vehicle; and relating to the reckless homicide charge, he sought suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564578 - 2022-09-13
[PDF]
Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County
2004 WI App 35 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1897-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6682 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 35 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1897-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6682 - 2017-09-20