Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 20931 for word.
Search results 5131 - 5140 of 20931 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
find that Phillips has serious difficulty in controlling his behavior. In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81532 - 2014-09-15
find that Phillips has serious difficulty in controlling his behavior. In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81532 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kevin C. Spinks
on the stand to testify would have offered no additional facts or benefit. In other words, Spinks could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18386 - 2017-09-21
on the stand to testify would have offered no additional facts or benefit. In other words, Spinks could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18386 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
is given its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96858 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
] the fact that Officer Glover did not use the words “drug dealing” in his report, that that does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27387 - 2014-09-15
] the fact that Officer Glover did not use the words “drug dealing” in his report, that that does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27387 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 2
intended. In other words, because double jeopardy protection prohibits double punishment for the “same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34869 - 2011-06-14
intended. In other words, because double jeopardy protection prohibits double punishment for the “same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34869 - 2011-06-14
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
used the word “concurrent” instead of “consecutive” in its original sentence pronouncement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
used the word “concurrent” instead of “consecutive” in its original sentence pronouncement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not been made “in so many words” before, but that a similar offer had been “conveyed a couple of times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
not been made “in so many words” before, but that a similar offer had been “conveyed a couple of times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70282 - 2014-09-15
Certification
was required by Wis. Stat. § 973.047(1f) to order the defendant to provide a sample. In other words, the very
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40876 - 2009-09-15
was required by Wis. Stat. § 973.047(1f) to order the defendant to provide a sample. In other words, the very
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40876 - 2009-09-15
[PDF]
Green Valley Disposal Co., Inc. v. Soils and Engineering Services, Inc.
words the parties used in the contract. Id. Mutual mistake, however, will excuse a party from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14469 - 2017-09-21
words the parties used in the contract. Id. Mutual mistake, however, will excuse a party from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in that breath test give me the word, and I’ll take you over, and we’ll go to the Sheriff’s Department and do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62519 - 2014-09-15
in that breath test give me the word, and I’ll take you over, and we’ll go to the Sheriff’s Department and do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62519 - 2014-09-15