Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51301 - 51310 of 56214 for n y c.
Search results 51301 - 51310 of 56214 for n y c.
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in addressing and deciding this issue. C. Sentencing. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in addressing and deciding this issue. C. Sentencing. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Parkland Venture LLC, Arthur D. Dyer, Norman C. Dyer, Jr., William Fink, DDS, Valerie A. Esler and Kim E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
Parkland Venture LLC, Arthur D. Dyer, Norman C. Dyer, Jr., William Fink, DDS, Valerie A. Esler and Kim E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121803 - 2014-09-16
State v. Alan Thomas LaPean
. The defendant will send a written letter of apology to the victim. c. The defendant will do 50 hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7386 - 2005-03-31
. The defendant will send a written letter of apology to the victim. c. The defendant will do 50 hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7386 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
657, 664, 314 N.W.2d 897, 900-901 (Ct. App. 1981). C. Ineffective Assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
657, 664, 314 N.W.2d 897, 900-901 (Ct. App. 1981). C. Ineffective Assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9831 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry T.
, § 938.538(5)(c) explicitly precludes application of the change in placement and revision statutes once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4317 - 2005-03-31
, § 938.538(5)(c) explicitly precludes application of the change in placement and revision statutes once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4317 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
, “[c]ounsel need not be perfect, indeed not even very good, to be constitutionally adequate.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2006-03-27
, “[c]ounsel need not be perfect, indeed not even very good, to be constitutionally adequate.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
); 939.63(1)(b); 939.62(1)(c); 939.50(3)(b), (f), (g) (2005-06). Thus, the sentences cannot be deemed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725101 - 2023-11-07
); 939.63(1)(b); 939.62(1)(c); 939.50(3)(b), (f), (g) (2005-06). Thus, the sentences cannot be deemed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725101 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
Mary H.-P. v. State
, as permitted under § 938.34(3)(c). The record thus demonstrates that in ordering Phillip to be placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12109 - 2017-09-21
, as permitted under § 938.34(3)(c). The record thus demonstrates that in ordering Phillip to be placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 79
under Rule 5.5(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. [4] Lawyers authorized to practice law
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84595 - 2014-09-15
under Rule 5.5(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. [4] Lawyers authorized to practice law
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84595 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
child from a prior marriage. 2 The premarital agreement stated, “Arthur C. Kordus represents only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35478 - 2014-09-15
child from a prior marriage. 2 The premarital agreement stated, “Arthur C. Kordus represents only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35478 - 2014-09-15