Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51321 - 51330 of 69038 for had.
Search results 51321 - 51330 of 69038 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
had bruising on her labia majora and on her cervix. When questioned by detectives, Jackson admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46435 - 2010-02-01
had bruising on her labia majora and on her cervix. When questioned by detectives, Jackson admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46435 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
without a recommendation had it been reminded of the parties’ agreement,” it “did not rely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187170 - 2017-09-21
without a recommendation had it been reminded of the parties’ agreement,” it “did not rely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187170 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
the material they were hauling,” and “[t]o check to see if they had the proper permit yet for being overweight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31
the material they were hauling,” and “[t]o check to see if they had the proper permit yet for being overweight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terrance L. Meloy, Jr.
sentencing he had not had any recollection of Meloy. Thus, there is no merit to this argument. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6425 - 2005-03-31
sentencing he had not had any recollection of Meloy. Thus, there is no merit to this argument. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6425 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
meaning of a de novo hearing is ‘[a] new hearing of a matter, conducted as if the original hearing had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52539 - 2010-07-26
meaning of a de novo hearing is ‘[a] new hearing of a matter, conducted as if the original hearing had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52539 - 2010-07-26
State v. Cory D. Klicko
that the trial court made a factual finding that the parties had agreed prior to the plea hearing that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16112 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court made a factual finding that the parties had agreed prior to the plea hearing that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16112 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
incorporated into SCR 22.31(1).[1] ¶6 The referee in this case concluded that Attorney Lieuallen had met all
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30379 - 2007-09-24
incorporated into SCR 22.31(1).[1] ¶6 The referee in this case concluded that Attorney Lieuallen had met all
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30379 - 2007-09-24
CA Blank Order
prejudice after the plea had been taken but before sentencing because the State discovered it had apparently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133308 - 2015-01-20
prejudice after the plea had been taken but before sentencing because the State discovered it had apparently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133308 - 2015-01-20
CA Blank Order
complaint fails to state a claim for a violation of his procedural due process rights because he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109302 - 2014-03-17
complaint fails to state a claim for a violation of his procedural due process rights because he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109302 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. 1 One of the offenses had an additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503822 - 2022-04-06
and Anders v. 1 One of the offenses had an additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503822 - 2022-04-06