Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51351 - 51360 of 64166 for records.
Search results 51351 - 51360 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Tonya R. Rio
enforcement officers observe, record, and report their findings and evidence. From these procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12546 - 2017-09-21
enforcement officers observe, record, and report their findings and evidence. From these procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12546 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
her pleas. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107554 - 2014-01-27
her pleas. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107554 - 2014-01-27
State v. Steven Curtes
] Although the trial court did not make a specific finding in this regard, this court may review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11784 - 2005-03-31
] Although the trial court did not make a specific finding in this regard, this court may review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11784 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis E. Jones
on the armed robbery charge. The separate exposure from each crime was stated on the record. The finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9934 - 2005-03-31
on the armed robbery charge. The separate exposure from each crime was stated on the record. The finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9934 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel T. Suchla
)(a), Stats. For a person without a drunk driving record, a “prohibited alcohol concentration” is defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9945 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. For a person without a drunk driving record, a “prohibited alcohol concentration” is defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9945 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14959 - 2005-03-31
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14959 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
an accounting of trust accounts and related client records.[2] The Supreme Court of Arizona found
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105945 - 2013-12-19
an accounting of trust accounts and related client records.[2] The Supreme Court of Arizona found
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105945 - 2013-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Edgar Smith
2 Yessin's first name is inconsistently spelled throughout the trial court record and on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7944 - 2017-09-19
2 Yessin's first name is inconsistently spelled throughout the trial court record and on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7944 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not apply. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435930 - 2021-10-05
not apply. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435930 - 2021-10-05
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasoning process based on the facts on the record and a “conclusion based on a logical rationale founded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17
a reasoning process based on the facts on the record and a “conclusion based on a logical rationale founded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29734 - 2007-07-17