Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51391 - 51400 of 59770 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
the motion because justice requires an amendment of the pleadings. Sweeney also claims he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47529 - 2010-03-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as a sexually violent person.” Accordingly, there is no arguable merit to a claim the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158101 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David R. Kaster
of the assault to be considered school staff. Alternatively, he claimed any services he was providing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24626 - 2017-09-21

State v. James M. Wiest
] The general rule is also endorsed by Professor Wigmore: A waiver at a former trial should bar a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12329 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
relief. Jeffrey claims the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion after his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26929 - 2006-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Olson, claim that a doctor’s negligence committed during Brenda’s pregnancy caused neurological damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68316 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court failed to fulfill its obligations for taking a guilty plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213101 - 2018-05-17

State v. James A. Tanksley
not impact Josh’s truthfulness. Tanksley admitted touching Josh’s genitals, but claimed that he did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14797 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Walter Rieckhoff
no contest plea based upon his claim of newly-discovered evidence. The basis for his motion was his post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10605 - 2017-09-20

June Halverson v. Vernon Memorial Hospital
, as here, the circuit court has reviewed the verdict and sustained it against a claim of excessiveness. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10747 - 2005-03-31