Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 29936 for des.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 29936 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Annie B. Jenkins
), whether a circumstance is a “new factor” is an issue of law that we resolve de novo, State v. Ambrose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10156 - 2017-09-19
), whether a circumstance is a “new factor” is an issue of law that we resolve de novo, State v. Ambrose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10156 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark W. Albers
attack that conviction. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7283 - 2017-09-20
attack that conviction. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7283 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
a new factor exists presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10262 - 2017-09-20
a new factor exists presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Michels, 150 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10262 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Palzkill v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
amputation or complete paralysis. We interpret No(s). 99-0608 3 statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15220 - 2017-09-21
amputation or complete paralysis. We interpret No(s). 99-0608 3 statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
competency to proceed on a matter is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. The final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218977 - 2018-09-11
competency to proceed on a matter is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. The final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218977 - 2018-09-11
Michael Solomon v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. On certiorari review, we decide de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether it acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
. On certiorari review, we decide de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether it acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12940 - 2005-03-31
Althea M. Keup v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
. This issue involves statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16594 - 2005-03-31
. This issue involves statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16594 - 2005-03-31
State v. Turhan V. Taylor
determinations on counsel's performance and whether it was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8394 - 2005-03-31
determinations on counsel's performance and whether it was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8394 - 2005-03-31
Erna Seidlitz v. Dieter Seidlitz
Dieter’s motion. Dieter then sought and received a de novo review of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31
Dieter’s motion. Dieter then sought and received a de novo review of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04