Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 74953 for public records.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 74953 for public records.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Winkel
I. The referee's report agreed with the OLR's recommendation that a public reprimand be issued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20615 - 2005-12-12
I. The referee's report agreed with the OLR's recommendation that a public reprimand be issued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20615 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
. The hearing record reflects that citizens present at the public hearing expressed concerns regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
. The hearing record reflects that citizens present at the public hearing expressed concerns regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Winkel
that a public reprimand be issued to Attorney Winkel on the billing issue. ¶5 Neither Attorney Winkel nor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21
that a public reprimand be issued to Attorney Winkel on the billing issue. ¶5 Neither Attorney Winkel nor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
harassment of the petitioners, including pointing surveillance cameras at the petitioners' house to record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214322 - 2018-06-15
harassment of the petitioners, including pointing surveillance cameras at the petitioners' house to record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214322 - 2018-06-15
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit and supplemental no-merit reports, Saxton’s response, and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138270 - 2015-03-24
of the no-merit and supplemental no-merit reports, Saxton’s response, and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138270 - 2015-03-24
State v. Jay Warren Downs
is an investigative report of a government agency which is admissible under the public record exception to the hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14434 - 2005-03-31
is an investigative report of a government agency which is admissible under the public record exception to the hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jay Warren Downs
which is admissible under the public record exception to the hearsay rule contained in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14434 - 2017-09-21
which is admissible under the public record exception to the hearsay rule contained in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14434 - 2017-09-21
Anita Roberts v. Manitowoc County Board of Adjustment
contends that the Board applied the wrong legal standard, employed unfair time limits to minimize public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25782 - 2006-08-29
contends that the Board applied the wrong legal standard, employed unfair time limits to minimize public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25782 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
Anita Roberts v. Manitowoc County Board of Adjustment
to minimize public input, and made a decision unsupported by the evidence. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25782 - 2017-09-21
to minimize public input, and made a decision unsupported by the evidence. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25782 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for describing what he observed on the record rather than simply taking note of it in silence. A trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27410 - 2014-09-15
for describing what he observed on the record rather than simply taking note of it in silence. A trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27410 - 2014-09-15