Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 59024 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Miller
motion to withdraw his no contest pleas to the offenses. Miller claims his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5560 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Miller
motion to withdraw his no contest pleas to the offenses. Miller claims his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5567 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a website, P.K., who claimed that she was eighteen but was actually fourteen. Nutting picked up P.K. from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247873 - 2019-10-02

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Washington
things, the effectiveness of his attorney at the count one trial. Judge Flynn rejected these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Grant W. LaPlant v. Pierro Hamse Wipperfurth
in part and cause remanded with directions. ΒΆ1 VERGERONT, J.1 This is a small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15232 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Miller
motion to withdraw his no contest pleas to the offenses. Miller claims his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5566 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Miller
motion to withdraw his no contest pleas to the offenses. Miller claims his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5558 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gloria C. Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee County
was less than the County paid. Case number 2003AP2127 involves Pinczkowski's claim for a replacement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20468 - 2017-09-21

Gloria C. Pinczkowski v. Milwaukee County
purchased a new residence for $155,000 and sought to claim a replacement housing payment. The County denied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20468 - 2013-11-30

COURT OF APPEALS
was that the trial court erred and he was therefore entitled to a new trial. First, he claimed the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32247 - 2008-04-01